With this inscription I will prove that Bitcoin has non-circular intrinsic value. I will prove this with a testable, falsifiable economic theorem. This economic theorem is written as an immutable inscription on bitcoin, therefore it cannot be deleted or censored.

This economic theorem is a game-theoretic scenario. You can choose to:
1.) ignore this,
2.) make an offer for how much you think this inscription is worth, 
3.) short bitcoin.

If you choose the first option, then someone else will choose the second or third option. If you choose the second option, then someone else inherently has incentive to offer more than you. If you choose the third option, then someone else will choose the first or second option.

With the second option, why does someone else inherently have incentive to offer more than you? The amount someone will offer for this inscription will grow in proportion to the amount of attention it gets. And the amount of attention it gets will grow as this economic theorem is proven: Bitcoin has non-circular intrinsic value. And this is proven insofar as bitcoin serves as a store-of-value for priceless, immutable inscriptions like this one. And this intrinsic value and store-of-value is non-circular because priceless, immutable inscriptions are not money (like bitcoin), but the ground of money and are more valuable than money. And inasmuch as this is proven, Bitcoin will be more valuable than any other world currency, since no other world currency serves as a store-of-value for priceless, immutable inscriptions like this one, that are more valuable than money.

The only way that this economic theorem can be falsified is if enough people choose the third option, to short bitcoin in response to this theorem, and bitcoin goes to zero. But even then, someone will just copy or modify this inscription and theorem on another chain and it will be proven that way. Similarly, let us suppose that by an unfathomable conspiracy, everyone chooses the first option, everyone ignores this and no one makes any offer. Someone else will inevitably try to copy, modify, or improve this theorem until they do get an offer. But it will be written by someone else and at a later date. And that inscription will be inspired by or derived from this one.

Therefore, this original inscription holds the most fundamental value. And the timestamp proves it is the original. And so anyone would be better off to own this original inscription rather than a derivative.

Therefore, it is clear the best shared interest is to choose the second option, to make an offer. The first offer will seem to be either too low or too high. But the second, third, fourth, and so on, already proves that that offer is too low. The game theoretic scenario results in a race-to-the-top, in terms of both price and quality of inscriptions; a distributed order around the discovery of inscriptions that serve as the best store-of-value.

Thus, this testable, falsifiable economic theorem proves that Bitcoin has non-circular intrinsic value.